Experiments
Isaac Newton
stressed the importance for
science
of combining
mathematical theories (
models) of reality
with experiments. He argued for
an "experimental philosophy" of science. Science should not, as
Descartes
argued, be based on fundamental principles discovered by
reason, but based
on fundamental
axioms
shown to be true by experiments.
"
although the arguing from experiments and observations by induction be no
demonstration of general conclusions, yet it is the best way of arguing
which the nature of things admits of."
Newton, I. 1704
quoted
Losee, J. 1972
p.81
In general terms, we use the word experiment in two ways. We can mean
trying out new things, or testing by experience. A man wearing lipstick
might be experimenting in both ways. He could be trying out something new
for him. He might also be testing public reaction. His activities might be
described as a social experiment, but they are not what we normally
consider a scientific experiment.
A scientific experiment is a procedure constructed to discover,
demonstrate or test significant truth about reality, under controlled
conditions, in a way that can be repeated by other people with similar
results. Like the man wearing lipstick, constructing the experiment
requires imagination. Like the man wearing lipstick, experience is
providing something that imagination on its own could not.
With a scientific experiment, however, the "truth" that we are
discovering, demonstrating or testing will have to be carefully formulated,
the conditions of the experiment will be carefully specified and the
rational connection between the truth discovered, demonstrated or tested,
and the experimental results, will be logically laid out. Newton formulated
his truths mathematically and most scientific experiments are quantitative.
By saying that the truth should be significant, I mean that it should
relate to a general body of theory that can be seen to rationally and
usefully explain the world in a way acceptable to scientists. It may relate
by just showing that an accepted scientific theory does not adequately
explain reality - but it must relate in some way to scientific theory.
Statistical Experiments
Statistical
experiments
are common in many
sciences, including biology,
psychology, medicine and ecology. In Simple Statistics,
Frances Clegg
gives this "Summary of
experimental procedure".
- Have an idea (
theory) about the
effect of one
variable
upon another.
- Define the
independent variables and the
dependent variables
- Decide how the variables will be quantified. (What the units of
measurement are)
- Express the idea formally as an
experimental hypothesis
.
- Decide what kind of statistical analysis will be appropriate.
- Specify a
significance level
and
sample
size.
- Select the sample to be used from the parent population which is under
scrutiny.
- Divide the sample into two
- Apply the experimental treatment to one part of the sample, and treat
the other as a
control group.
- Collect the results. These will be two sets of scores, one for the
experimental group and one for the control group, showing how the dependent
variable altered as the independent variable was altered.
- Analyse the data
- Establish the null hypothesis
- Apply an appropriate
statistical test
or
technique
- Accept or reject the null hypothesis in the light of the last step
- Draw a
conclusion
about whether the
experimental hypothesis has been confirmed or not.
Experimental Hypothesis
A hypothesis is an idea or theory that predicts what might happen. An
experimental hypothesis is a prediction, made to be tested, that one thing
(
variable) will affect
another.
The hypothesis will suggest that when one of two variables alters, the
other will as well.
Independent and Dependent Variables
The first variable (the one we alter to
affect the other) is called the independent variable. The variable we
predict will be altered is called the dependent variable.
Example "Drug x is good for making people with colds better"
predicts that the independent variable "Drug x" will tend to make the
dependent variable, "people with colds", better.
Non-directional hypotheses A non-directional hypothesis does not
predict which way the independent
variable will affect the dependent variable.
Example "Drug x will have an affect on people's colds"
This does not predict if it will make the colds better or worse.
Directional hypotheses A directional hypothesis predicts the way
the independent variable will affect the dependent variable.
Examples:
"Drug x will make people's colds worse"
OR
"Drug x will make people's colds better"
The slang term for a non-directional hypothesis is a "two-tailed"
hypothesis because the experimenter predicts correctly whether the people
with colds get better or worse. A directional hypothesis is called a
one-tailed hypothesis. As with tossing a coin that has one head and one
tail, only one out of two predictions can be correct.
But notice that, with experimental hypotheses, there is a third
possibility. The independent variable may have no effect. The drug may not
influence the colds in any way. This possibility is called the
null hypothesis
Statistical Tests
Tests of Significance
Statistical tests are used to see if
samples
of numbers appear to have come from
one or from two
populations. The
statistical test will also say what the likely margin of error is.
Another way of saying this, is that the statistical test tests whether
a difference observed between two samples is likely to reflect a real
difference between two populations.
For example:
One sample of twenty people with colds was given drug x. A control
sample of twenty people with colds was not given any treatment. 10 of the
first sample had stopped sneezing two hours after taking drug x. At the
same time, 8 of the control sample were found to have stopped sneezing.
It would appear that drug x works. But is the difference between
samples likely to reflect a real difference between the (hypothetical)
population of all people with colds who might take drug x, and the
(hypothetical) population of the (same) people with colds, but without
taking drug x?
Null Hypothesis
The Null Hypothesis is a hypothesis that, (despite the difference
between the samples), there is no difference between the populations. This
would mean that the difference we have observed between the samples is due
to sampling error.
The Null Hypothesis is contrasted with the
Alternative Hypothesis
The Alternative Hypothesis is the hypothesis we will accept if the Null
Hypothesis is rejected.
In a test of significance the null hypothesis is taken to be true
throughout the calculations until the last stage. It is only rejected if it
is very unlikely to be correct.
Tests of significance set up a model that is based on the assumption
that there is no difference between the populations. This "null hypothesis"
is only rejected if it is very difficult to fit the data to such a model.
If this proves to be the case, the Alternative Hypothesis is accepted.
Conclusions about the Experimental Hypothesis
If it is found, by a statistical test of significance, that a
difference between two samples reflects a real difference between two
populations, this is said in a way that shows how reliable the conclusion
is.
For Example:
"The results of the statistical analysis were significant at the
p is less than or equal to 0.05
level".
This means that there is a 5% chance (p = probability) that, despite
the difference observed between the two samples, there is no difference
between the populations, and a 95% chance that the difference observed
between the two samples reflects a real difference.
Study
Link
Andrew Roberts' web Study Guide
Top of
Page
Take a Break - Read a Poem
Click coloured words to go where you want
Andrew Roberts likes to hear from users: To contact him, please
use the Communication
Form
© Andrew Roberts
|
|