The
Open-Door System
It is only of late years that the disuse of locked doors has been regarded
as forming an important feature in the administration of an asylum.
Detached houses, or limited sections of the main buildings, the inmates of
which consisted chiefly of patients requiring little supervision, have long
been conducted in some institutions without locked doors. But the general
practice of all large asylums has been to keep the doors of the various
wards strictly under lock and key. . . .
When an attendant could no longer trust to locked doors for the detention
of troublesome and discontented patients, it became necessary that he
should keep himself aware at all times of where they were and what they
were doing. And it therefore became his interest to Engage them in such
occupations as would make them contented, to provide an orderly outlet for
their energies, and to divert their minds from thoughts of escape. The
relations of an attendant to his patient thus assumed less of the character
of a gaoler, and more the character of a companion or nurse; and it was
eventually -found that this change in the character of the form of control
could be adopted in the treatment of a much larger number of the patients
than was at first anticipated. It is not difficult to over-estimate the
extent to which a desire to escape affects the minds of patients in
asylums. The number who form a definite purpose of this kind really
constitutes only a very small proportion of them. The special watchfulness
required of attendants in guarding against determined efforts to escape,
therefore, need be directed to a few only of those under their charge, and
it soon becomes habitual to the attendants to keep themselves aware of
where those patients are, about whom they entertain doubt. And it should be
borne in mind, in regard to this kind of watchfulness, that its very
persistency renders it more easily kept up than if it could be occasionally
relaxed. It appeared further that the disuse of locked doors had an
influence on some of the patients in diminishing the desire to escape.
Under the system of locked doors, a patient with that desirip was apt to
allow his mind to be engrossed by the idea of watching for the opportunity
of an open door, and it was by no means infrequent to
find such a patient watching with cat-like eagerness for this chance. The
effect of the constantly open door upon such a patient, when the novelty of
the thing had worn off, was to deprive him of special chances of escape on
which to exercise his vigilance, since, so far as doors were to be
considered, it was as easy to escape at one time as another ; and it was
found that the desire often became dormant and inoperative if not called
into action by the stimulus of special opportunity. It is, indeed, a thing
of common experience that the mere feeling of being locked in is sufficient
to awaken a desire to get out. This happens both with the sane and the
insane ; but it is certain that the mental condition of many patients in
asylums renders them likely to be influenced in an especial manner by such
a feeling. With many, however, the desire to escape dies away when it
ceases to be suggested by forcing upon their attention the means of
preventing it.
It is year by year becoming more clearly recognized that many advantages
result from the working of the open-door system, and it has now been
adopted to a greater or less extent in most of the Scotch asylums. . . .
Liberty on Parole
The practice of permitting certain patients to walk or work in the grounds
without constant supervision, and of permitting some to take exercise
beyond the grounds on parole, has been general in Scotch asylums for many
years, but it is now much more extensively adopted in them than it used to
be. Like the other removals of restrictions to which we' have referred,
this has found favour in the eyes of superintendents on account of the
beneficial effect which it has on the patients, not merely in making their
residence in an asylum less irksome, but also by improving their mental
condition. The fears which were naturally entertained that this form of
relaxation of control would be followed by an increase in the number of
accidents and escapes, have not proved to be well founded.
In determining the desirability of any kind of restrictive discipline
and supervision, it has to be considered, among other things, whether the
irritation that it occasions may not render the danger of accidents from
violent conduct greater than it would be if such discipline were not
enforced. . . .
Benefits arising from the Removal of Restrictions
The beneficial effects arising from the removal of the various forms of
restrictions on liberty are no doubt due, in great measure, to the
increased attention that is given to the features of each patient's
condition, for it is only after a careful study of the disposition and
tendencies of a patient that a trustworthy opinion can be formed as to the
amount of liberty that he is fit to enjoy. But it must also be recognized
that the freedom from irksome discipline and restriction tends to remove
one of the sources of violent conduct in asylums, and consequently to
diminish the number of accidents which result from it. Many patients have,
under the freer conditions of their life, become calm and orderly in
behaviour to whom the imprisonment in wards under lock and key, the
confinement within high-walled airing-courts, and even the feeling of being
under the constant supervision of attendants, were sources of irritation
and excitement and causes of violent conduct.
There are other advantages which spring from this relinquishing of some of
the physical means of detention. One of these, the importance of which will
be readily appreciated, is the inducement it affords, not only to
superintendents, but to every one concerned m the management of the
patients, to acquire a full and correct knowledge of the mental condition
and character of each patient. It not only increases the interest they have
in ascertaining how far, and in what ways, each patient is fit to be
trusted, but it strengthens in a very practical manner their motives for
endeavouring to secure his contentment and orderly behaviour. The judging
of what is required for these purposes inevitably involves a good deal of
intelligent observation of each patient, not only on admission, but during
the whole time he is resident in the asylum. It becomes of practical
importance to those in charge to note changes in his mental condition,
whether in the direction of improvement or the reverse ; and thus
favourable or unfavourable symptoms are observed and considered which in
other circumstances might receive little attention. The general effect of
the change of system is to raise the position of the attendants from being
mere servants who carry out more or less efficiently the orders of the
superintendent to that of persons who have a direct interest in promoting
the improvement of the patients, and who find it an advantage to themselves
to carry out, to the best of their ability, whatever instructions they
receive with that end in view. A good attendant must always have had more
or less of this character, it is true ; but even good attendants are
stimulated under the freer system to become still better.
Industrial Occupation
One effect of the removal of physical restrictions has been to stimulate as
well as aid the superintendents of asylums in their efforts to develop the
industrial occupation of the patients. The disadvantages of prolonged
idleness, to the insane as well as to the sane, and the advantages that
result from such occupation as gives exercise to the physical and mental
energies without overstraining them, are too obvious to require discussion.
It was consequently an important result of the disuse of walled
airing-courts and of the open-door system, that it became necessary to
engage the attention of patients who were inclined to escape, anc also of
the much larger number who might wander away without any such definite
purpose, so as to keep them under control and supervision. It did not
require much study of the mental state of the patients, nor indeed much
attention of any kind on the part of their attendants, to insure their safe
custody, when the conditions of their life were either to be locked within
their wards, to be confined within the high walls of airing-courts, or to
be marched in military order at stated periods for exercise. Under such
conditions, there was no strong motive for inducing those patients to work
who showed no disposition to do so of their own accord. The morbid
excitement, the apathies, or the gloomy feelings of many patients were
allowed to remain unchecked, and not unfrequently the mental disease was
intensified rather than alleviated. The more restless patients often spent
much of their day in pacing the galleries or the airing-courts, nursing
their morbid irritability, while others lounged on the benches or crept
into corners, and so drifted downwards through the dreary stages of
physical and mental decay. It does not require much consideration to show
that it would tend to improve all such patients, both in their bodily and
mental health, if they were engaged in some regular occupation during a
reasonable portion of their time. . . .
The Industrial System cannot be adapted to all Classes of Patients
But there are patients, both among those of the private and among those of
the pauper class, whom it is undesirable, and whom it would also be wrong,
to engage in work. There are cases, for instance, in which, for various
reasons, such as physical weakness, it would be directly injurious to the
patients to be engaged in active or fatiguing work ; and it would be
unsatisfactory if it were found that the efforts to develop the industrial
system in asylums led to such patients being pressed to work. . . .
Advantage of the Farm as a Source of Occupation
The number of persons available for work on an asylum farm is always great;
and in those asylums where full advantage has been taken of the
opportunities which the farm affords, it is found that the directions in
which the labour of patients may be utilized are much more numerous and
various than at first sight may appear. For instance, one large outlet for
their labour is supplied by the use of spade husbandry in circumstances in
which the ordinary farmer would use the plough. Another outlet is to be
found in the cultivation of crops of garden vegetables, which the ordinary
farmer does not usually undertake. The carrying out of improvements on the
farm or estate also gives employments of various kinds, and it is here,
perhaps, that what may be called the elasticity of land as a source of
labour for asylum inmates becomes more evident. If the land attached to an
asylum is of any considerable extent, it will nearly always happen that
important re-arrangements are deemed desirable; and when there is a
disposition to encourage improvements of this kind, it is generally found
that they afford a very abundant and varied source of labour. Road-making,
embanking, draining, fencing, planting, and even building, are generally
found to be required ; and in connection with these things, and with the
work more accurately included under the term agricultural, there are
subsidiary forms of industry developed. Indeed, the different kinds of work
afforded by the re-arrangements and improvements on an estate prove of
great value in asylum administration, for they afford some of the simplest
kinds of outdoor labour. Many patients can be engaged in such occupations
as digging and wheeling, who can with difficulty be engaged in less simple
kinds of work ; and by securing an ample supply of such simple work the
number of patients who share in the benefits of active healthy labour in
the open air is much increased. . . .
It is impossible to dismiss the subject of asylun farms without some
reference to the way in which they contribute to the mental health of the
inmates by affording subjects of interest to many of them. Even among
patients drawn from urban districts, there are few to whom the operations
of rural life present no features of interest; while to those drawn from
rural districts the horses, the oxen, the sheep, and the crops are
unfailing sources of attraction. The healthy mental action which we try to
evoke in a somewhat artificial manner, by furnishing the walls of the rooms
in which the patients live, with artistic decoration, is naturally supplied
by the farm. For one patient who will be stirred to rational reflection or
conversation by such a thing as a picture, twenty of the ordinary inmates
of asylums will be so stirred in connection with the prospects of the
crops, the •points of a horse, the illness of a cow, the lifting of the
potatoes, the laying out of a road, the. growth of the trees, the state of
the fenceSj or the sale of the pigs.
Importance of Active Physical Work for Women
... An attempt, attended with considerable success, has been made in some
asylums to supply this deficiency by the development of the work of the
laundry and washing-house. . . .
"There are two directions in which the worth of the washing-house may be
developed. One is by obtaining work from outside sources, as has been done
in some institutions, where a considerable amount of washing and dressing
is done for persons living in the neighbourhood. Another direction is by
avoiding the use in the washing-house of all machinery which diminishes the
amount of hand labour. And we are disposed to regard both these modes as
deserving of encouragement. . . .
Difficulties met with in carrying out Improvements
In relaxing restrictions upon the liberty of the insane, there is a certain
amount of prejudice in the public mind to be met and overcome. There is a
feeling of timidity in regard to persons labouring under insanity, which
leads to their being regarded as without exception and in all circumstances
unfit to be trusted with any degree of liberty. As a result of this, there
is a tendency, when a patient in an asylum inflicts injury on others or on
himself, to blame the superintendent for having permitted the patient to
have such liberty of action as made the inflicting of the injury possible ;
and there is consequently a temptation, to a superintendent who wishes to
avoid adverse public criticism, to adopt restrictive measures of the most
complete character.
It was under the influence of such views that strait jackets, manacles, and
chains were used before the introduction of what is called the system of
non-restraint. When such restraints were used it was said that no blame
could be attached to persons in charge of a patient for any violent deed
which might be perpetrated, because it was held that every possible
precaution had been taken to prevent it. The error that lurked beneath this
statement was not perceived. It was not recognized that in taking
precautions against one set of evils, other evils of a graver character
were created. Even the evils which it was sought to avoid were not avoided.
The first man from whom Pinel removed the manacles had,
with those very manacles, killed one of his keepers. The superintendent who
really takes most precautions against violence is not the man who applies
the most complete restrictions upon liberty, but he who weighs the general
results of different modes of treatment, and selects that which proves in
practice most successful in decreasing the number of violent acts.
We cannot hope, in carrying out any system, to exclude the effect of
mistakes in judgment and neglects of duty. ...
One difficulty for which no satisfactory solution has yet been found is the
finding of employment for male patients during bad weather, when little
outdoor occupation is to be had. It would be of great advantage if some
simple indoor occupation, adapted to the peculiarities of the insane, were
devised which could be taken up occasionally when outdoor occupation
failed. . . .
Increased Comfort of Asylums.
It is satisfactory to record our conviction that all the changes just
alluded to have tended not only to facilitate the administration of
asylums, and to produce greater contentment among the inmates, but also to
exert a real curative influence. The scenes of turbulence and excitement
which used to be of frequent occurrence in asylums have become much less
frequent, and in the asylums where the changes in question have been most
fully carried out, such scenes are comparatively rare. It does not admit of
doubt that the occurrence of these fits of excitement had a deteriorating
effect on the mental condition of the patients, and often retarded, if they
did not in some cases prevent, their recovery. It is not unusual now to
pass through all the wards of some of the larger asylums without observing
a single instance of disorderly behaviour, and we believe this is properly
attributed to such changes as have just been noted. It is true that
excitement may, to some extent, be kept in check by the use of calmative
drugs ; but we believe we are justified in saying that this practice is
largely followed in no Scotch asylum, while it is scarcely adopted at all
in those in which manifestations of excitement are least frequent, in which
restrictions on liberty are most completely withdrawn, and in which
industrial occupation has its greatest development.
Lastly in regard to that most important point, on which Dr Fraser thus
speaks : -
The Influences which are at present operating on the Boarding out of
Lunatics
The influences which, from my experience and observation, I believe to be
operating upon these methods of provision for the insane, especially upon
the pauper portion, seem to me to be as follows:-
The efforts of medical officers of institutions to discharge chronic
lunatics whom they consider suitable for being cared for in private
dwellings.
The action of inspectors of poor in either initiating the removal of
suitable cases, or in seconding the efforts of medical superintendents in
this direction.
The amount and accessibility of asylum accommodation in each district.
The rate of maintenance in asylums.
The supply of suitable guardians.
The influence of the grant in aid.
The Action of Medical Officers of Asylums
. . Owing to my having had at one time the superintendence of the
asylum for Fife and Kinross, I am able to deal more
satisfactorily with the statistics of this district than with those of
other parts of the country. From a return which I have been favoured with,
I find that the efforts to send out patients in this district have been
effective and successful. During 1880 there have been discharged improved
eighteen patients, five of whom were committed to the care of friends, and
thirteen of whom were placed under the guardianship of strangers. . . .
The question which naturally suggests itself is - What would be the result
were this practice possible in every institution, and in every district ?
On calculation I find that, had an equal proportion of the inmates of all
asylums been similarly transferred to private care, no less than four
hundred and three patients would have been removed from institutions to
care in private dwellings, whereas the fact is that only sixty-eight were
so transferred. Only one patient out of the eighteen who were transferred
from the Fife and Kinross Asylum has had to be returned to the asylum, and
he was one of those who were boarded with friends. . . .
The Action of Inspectors of Poor
The efforts of medical superintendents of asylums may do much, but it must
be recognized that the success and extension of the boarding system is
largely, if not mainly, in the hands of the inspectors of poor. Their
action is three-fold:
-
they may initiate the removal of their chronic insane from institutions;
-
they may co-operate with asylum officers in readily removing such lunatics
as these officers intimate to be fit for being boarded out, and in
procuring suitable guardians and homes for them ; and
-
they may, by well-directed efforts, instead of hurrying every lunatic into
an asylum, as the practice with some is, provide in like manner for those
idiotic and insane paupers who, even when they first become chargeable, do
not require asylum treatment and care. . . .
Economy, one of the proper objects of parochial administration, is attained
by this method of providing for the insane poor, and not only is it
economical, as I will immediately show, but for a large proportion of
chronic lunatics it is efficient and beneficial. From a return with which I
have been favoured from the City Parish, Edinburgh, the average cost,
inclusive of supervision and every other item of expenditure, for the
insane boarded with strangers is £19 a year. The asylum rate during
the last five years has been £27 per annum.
The Amount and Accessibility of Asylum Accommodation in each
District
It has now become a matter of everyday observation, that where there is
ample asylum accommodation the boarding out of the insane is either
entirely neglected or avoided, or but languidly attempted. . . .
It follows that ample asylum accommodation though in itself a service and a
safeguard to society, is yet apt to be an inducement to wasteful parochial
administration. . . .
The Rate of Maintenance in Asylums.
In
Dumfriesshire, where special circumstances have kept the asylum
rate exceptionally low, and where agricultural avocations are well paid,
the guardians require a high rate of board, and thus the cost of boarding
out, when clothing, medical visits, and other expenses are included, is
nearly equal to the rate of maintenance in the asylum for the district.
It therefore stands to reason that where the asylum rate is near to that
required for outdoor care, the economic inducement to board out will apply
only to those patients who have friends willing to have the charge of them.
It thus appears that a low rate of maintenance in an asylum is practically
prejudicial to the liberty of the chronic insane.
The Supply of Guardians
This feature of the system of boarding out the insane will appear to many
to be all-important. The excuse which inspectors frequently advance for
their lack of co-operation with medical officers of asylums is their
inability to find suitable guardians. It is, however, an excuse which my
experience does not permit me to regard as valid or sympathize with. . . .
The Influence of the Government Grant
I feel I need do no more than mention this agency in increasing the number
on the roll of single patients. The way in which it has led to this
increase has been fully treated of in the published Reports of the Board. .