Birmingham University [September 1965]
On my first day at the University, I went to see Dr. Stephen and was
allowed to borrow his original Ph.D. thesis. In this was described the
preparation and use of reagents such as 4-amino-4'-chlorobiphenyl. This
had been used to determine trace amounts of sulphate ion in 1953. My work
was intended to determine even smaller traces of sulphate and nitrate by
using this and other organic reagents.
Professor Belcher also offered me a small paid job. One evening per
week, I was engaged to coach his 12-year old son in mathematics. I had to
catch the bus to his house, and teach his son arithmetic, including
logarithms, and elementary algebra and geometry. His son was very polite,
tried hard, but was not very good at mathematics. For this work, I was
paid 12 shillings and sixpence per week, which I usually spent at the
hairdressers. My hair was very greasy, needed washing at least once per
week, and facilities for doing this at home were poor. Although I often
worked from 8 am in the morning until 10 pm at night, once per week I took
a three-hour lunch break, which included doing shopping for week-end meals
and having my hair done.
The laboratory was normally open on Saturday mornings and we were
expected to work until 1 pm. On Saturday afternoons I would sometimes take
a rest after having lunch in the canteen, but often examined my research
notes and planned the work for the following week in the laboratory. On
Sunday mornings I went to a Church run by Jesuits in Edgbaston, and cooked
my lunch at home on two gas rings. On Sunday afternoons I usually felt the
need to rest at home.
Once I had completed my first week's work at the University, I felt
confident enough to travel up to Rubery Hill Hospital, call at the
administrative office and reclaim my financial documents. After my
experiences at the convent hostel, I would not let this hospital have my
home address, but on producing identification I was relieved to get back my
savings account books. Soon I would need to withdraw some of this money to
live on, as insufficient money was coming into my current account. I left
these documents in a safe place at home. I felt relieved to be fully in
control of my own affairs once more.
A small part of the introduction to my research thesis was written at
home, and this follows.
"Trace analysis may be defined as the determination of a very small
amount of an inorganic or organic constituent present in a very much larger
weight of material. It is necessary in most industries to examine products
for the presence of contaminants, which may have very damaging effects on
the products, or be a toxic danger to the consumer. Chemical analysis for
traces of these contaminants is often necessary; the purity of the
chemicals required to carry out the analysis must also be checked. In
product development, and in biochemical and medical research, trace
analysis is often needed. With the ever increasing production of chemicals
or products containing chemicals whose long-term effects are unknown, trace
analysis is needed to make sure that these chemicals are not accumulating
in the soil, water or atmosphere of the earth, where they may be
transmitted to plant and animal life.
Sulphates and sulphur are amongst the commonest trace constituents of
organic matter, and sulphates are usually present in water. The
determination of small amounts of sulphate or sulphur is required in the
coal, rubber, petroleum, water-treatment, paper, pesticide and plastics
industries. It is necessary to analyze fine chemicals for sulphate
impurities, and to determine sulphur in sulphur-containing organic
compounds; and sub-micro analysis for sulphates or sulphur is frequently
required in medical and biochemical research."
The purpose of a University Department like ours was to produce general
analytical methods, which we hoped could be used and adapted by any
industry, public analyst or other user.
I was extremely fired by enthusiasm for this work and on some days
worked exceptionally long hours. I can remember arriving by an early bus
at 7am in the University laboratory and working until 11 pm at night. I
could not keep this up for long, but did this sometimes when the work
appeared to be going well, and I thought I was on the verge of discovering
new methods.
Unfortunately it was my mistaken belief that I needed the drug
Nardil
to give me the energy to do this work. I found a new GP who was willing to
write prescriptions for a month's supply of this drug. At this time
prescriptions were free and easily available. I told Dr. Stephen that I
was taking Nardil and I could see that he did not approve. However he
smoked a pipe and often walked round the laboratory smoking this, so I did
not feel guilty at taking Nardil. I thought "Dr Stephen needs his pipe to
keep going and I need the Nardil."
We were both wrong; but the kind of research which would have convinced
us of this, interested neither of us.
The flat was very comfortable. I had a bedsitting room and a separate
kitchen. The neighbours were quiet, and when at home I could write up my
notes easily. However at £10 per week I knew that I could not afford
to
stay there. I had to withdraw this amount from savings, because my
expenses on food, fares heat and light absorbed my total income which was
only £7 per week, obtained from a University charity.
On Saturday afternoons I had to look for alternative accommodation. I
did not find this until I had been in the flat for four weeks and had had
to withdraw another £40 to pay another four weeks' rent in advance.
The
new bedsitting room cost only £2 per week, but for four weeks I had
to pay
the rent on two lots of accommodation. I gave four weeks notice to my
present landlord, but did not move immediately.
At the end of October I moved to the attic bedsitting room in City
Road, Birmingham.
In the old flat I had had the luxury of a private toilet and bathroom.
Here such facilities were shared. Though I was quite used to sharing, in
this house it did not work out satisfactorily. It was necessary to put one
shilling in the meter in order to have a bath, but unfortunately the water
did not heat for an hour. I used to put my shilling in on Sunday mornings
at 6 am. Then I would go back to bed, and have a bath at 8 am.
This procedure worked satisfactorily for two weeks. On the third week,
when I got up at 8 am all my hot water had gone. I discovered that the
person living in the room below me, would creep into the bathroom at about
7 am and steal my water. My money was so short that I could not afford to
lose it. I would keep awake and on tenterhooks on Sunday mornings and keep
going to check if the water was hot. But as I was already so tired with
the week's work I could not always do this and often had my bath water
stolen during the next few weeks.
At the University I was told that I could have a free bath in the
student's union building. However this was at the other end of the campus,
and it took about half an hour to walk down there. As this facility was
closed at about 7 pm each evening, I could not usually spare time from my
work to do this. Even my meal times were hurried. During the week I ate
lunch at 1 pm and tea at about 6 pm in the nearby students' refectory.
These meals took all my weekly cash allowance, after fares, room heating
and the hairdressers and launderette had been paid for.
Then one day I was asked to visit a department containing a large
centrifuge, which I needed to use. It was at the other side of the
University building in which I worked. This meant a long walk down
corridors. I saw a ladies' toilet and entered to use it. Inside I found a
bathroom. There was a cleaner there and she told me that I could use this
bath if I wished. Thereafter I had a free bath each week in the University
building in which I worked. It was little used. Apparently, most students
did not know that this facility existed.
At home, I never did much cleaning; but did my washing up at the sink
in the corner of the room. In this room there was cold water only.
Usually I boiled a kettle for washing up.
One day I phoned my aunt in London and she told me she could no longer
look after my excess scientific books. I had planned to collect them one
day when I had time. I asked her why and she told me she did not want to
dust them. I could not understand this, because I hardly felt the need to
dust my books, and the top of the book-case took only five minutes to dust.
However, this meant I had to take a day off from work, which I could
ill spare and go to London to collect these books. These had to be packed
into cardboard boxes and sent to Birmingham by carrier. These were books
which I was not currently using, on subjects I had had to study for my
first degree, such as physics, mathematics and geology. When they arrived I
left them in one corner of my room, not having the time to unpack them.
My main concern was my work. For the next three months, I was busy
preparing samples of the dye Sulphonazo.
This had first been prepared by a chemist called Budesinsky working in
Czechoslovakia. His paper had been translated into English. At this time
several English people including my former colleague, Mr Fleet, who I first
met in the Government Chemist pesticide lab, had gone to work in
Czechoslovakia for a year. He did this following a Ph.D. at Birmingham. He
had been working with a different reagent than me, but it had also been
used for determining traces of sulphate. Though this was a "Communist"
country, a fairly liberal policy prevailed with regard to the exchange of
scientific workers. We had Klara, a 26 year old student working as a
research assistant in Professor Belcher's department, following her degree
in Czechoslovakia.
One of the other interests of Professor Belcher which had been
developed further in Czechoslovakia was the polarograph, or falling mercury
electrode, which was used for determining trace metals. I had never had the
opportunity to find out how this worked, being unable to understand the
textbooks on the subject, which were full of advanced mathematics. I was
much more at home with spectrophotometric methods which were used
extensively in food analysis and with paper chromatography which I had used
in the determination of traces of pesticide at the Laboratory of the
Government Chemist.
There were three student canteens at the University of Birmingham, in a
building near the library and administrative offices. There were three
floors with the cheapest canteen on the top floor, moderate prices on the
middle floor, and the most expensive at ground level.
I was short of money, nevertheless went to the moderately priced
canteen, as I could not tolerate the stodgy food served in the "cheapery".
My male colleagues went to the very cheap canteen at mid-day, usually
worked from 9 to 5 and presumably had better food cooked by their wives in
the evening. Some were unmarried; one young man said he lived in very
dingy lodgings; these being very cheap, suited him. All the woman students
were single. Most of these were 30 years of age or over. One woman, who
came from the Netherlands had had a career as a secretary, before giving
this up to do a chemistry degree, and obtaining a post as a research
assistant, which financed her M.Sc. For this privilege, she had to do
about three hours routine work per day. The rest of the time she was able
to devote to her research. Unlike me she had two years for completion of
the M.Sc. degree.
There was a man of 44 who was financed by his company. Until then he
had been a salesman, though originally qualified in chemistry, and having
experience of analysis in his early career. He had been advised by his firm
to return to bench work as an analyst and was being retrained for this
work. He was using ion exchange resins. He told me that Professor Belcher
who was his personal supervisor was making him work exceptionally hard. He
had other problems. His mother who had a long-term illness was now in
hospital, but her flat had to remain empty ready for her return. He was
worried about this, as he did not believe his mother would regain
sufficient health to look after herself in this flat. There was one other
older man. He was 50, and I was extremely surprised to find that he was a
research student. Apparently he had been made redundant from his previous
position as technical college lecturer, and Professor Belcher had invited
him to do a Ph.D. He was a personal friend of the Professor. He main
occupation appeared to be incinerating samples in a furnace and weighing
the ash. He never divulged what he was doing.
One person with whom I became quite friendly was called Aleya. She came
from Iraq, was westernised and said that she intended to settle in England.
Sometimes I went to the canteen at mid-day with her. It was in this canteen
that I first tasted water-melon. These slices of red, watery fruit were
served as a dessert. I had not been in the habit of buying fruit apart from
apples, oranges and bananas and strawberries during June and July. The
exotic fruits and year-round supplies which are in the shops to-day were
then unknown.
Colin was another student who was kind to me and showed me how thin
layer chromatography was done, in case I needed to use this technique in my
research. He also mended my broken iron, which blew up one day at home.
This was not exceptionally difficult; I think one of the wires had become
loose, but I had not time to examine it myself. I was working twice as hard
as most of the other research students because of my need to pack two years
work into one.
Chris was a Catholic. He told me he lived near Rubery Hill Hospital and
attended the church near there. I had met the priest in charge of this
church when he had briefly visited the hospital during the two weeks I
stayed there. Chris said that his sermons were very dull. I was finding
the sermons at the Jesuit Church interesting. The congregation was invited
to provide the bidding prayers each week, by putting their petitions in a
box at the back of the church. As many as possible of these were read out.
Chris never stayed late at work in the lab and appeared to be rather
unenthusiastic about his research. He was very efficient and tried to
devise the shortest method for completing each task; he went home promptly
at 5.30 pm each day. Some of the other students occasionally stayed late,
especially the older man of 44 who told me he had worked on mustard gas
during the war. He was glad that it had all been destroyed out at sea and
was never used in the second world war. I thought his ion exchange
research interesting as in my earlier days I had worked with these
materials at water treatment companies. One day when I felt unwell he took
me home to my lodgings in his car. I received many kindnesses and help
from the students during my year at Birmingham.
David was another quiet research student, single and living in
lodgings. In total we numbered four women and six men. It was a happy
atmosphere in this research lab. I had never enjoyed work so much.
None of us talked much about our research to the other students. It did
not appear to be the custom. The exception was the monthly lecture given by
each Ph.D. student in turn, when they would summarise what they were doing.
However as I was doing only an M.Sc., I was not asked to do this. Colin
was the unofficial leading research student. Unfortunately he was one of
the only ones who never succeeded in publishing a research paper. From my
M.Sc. work I eventually published two papers in a chemical journal, called
"Analytica Chimica Acta".
Besides the monthly lectures, we had an evening monthly social
gathering in an office near the laboratories. Professor Belcher attended
these functions, and our overseas students were encouraged to provide the
food, representative of their countries. The ex-secretary, who was doing
an M.Sc. like me, was Dutch. She provided a meal based on Dutch cheeses.
I am not sure what Klara provided but Czechoslovakian food was what she
had in mind.
We had an African student with us doing a Ph.D. but he was rarely
working in the lab during the day time. When I arrived early for work,
sometimes at 7 am, I would find him there and he told me that he worked all
night. He said that he preferred to work at night. The lab was always open.
There was a small back door left unlocked. I do not think the paid staff
and security men knew about this door. It led up spiral stairs on to a
balcony, from which the lab could be entered. I always used this door, and
very rarely entered by the front entrance, which was unlocked at about 8.30
am when the stores staff started work. These people left off at 5.30 pm.
My bench was directly adjoining the balcony. This balcony was sometimes
used for paper chromatography. These were often developed by means of a
spray. People did not want to contaminate the air in the lab with
solvents, so used the balcony as an alternative to a fume cupboard, which
were always full of apparatus used for making organic preparations.
My initial titrations using a micro-burette were so encouraging that
Professor Belcher became keenly interested in my work. Unfortunately when
the Sulphonazo failed to keep, even at low temperatures in the refrigerated
room, the work had to be abandoned.
Working at Birmingham University was always a pleasure. I had a bench
to myself and cupboards beneath it. It was similarly equipped to my old
bench in the food lab at the Government Chemist. Much walking about during
the day, carrying samples to different rooms was necessary. Complex
instrumental work was done in separate rooms which were kept cleaner and
drier than was possible in the main lab, where much glassware was used.
Often I had to walk about the campus. Sometimes I went to the students
union building for a bath. It was a long walk, by the lake to the opposite
end of the campus; this walk did me good after a long day in a confined
space. The edges of the lake were obscured by bushes, reeds and varied
plants, so it was not possible to walk very near the water's edge. Views
through the foliage were attractive. Often I walked round this lake during
cold weather when there were very few people about. During my time at
Birmingham, I met very few undergraduate students, and knew nothing about
their lives.
Occasionally I had to visit another building. One day, near the end of
November I had to visit the organic chemistry department, as capacious
fume-cupboards were available and the chlorine cylinders needed for the
preparation of a complex compound called 4-amino-4'-chlorobiphenyl were
stored there. I had to prepare a sample of this compound for my own use in
determining traces of sulphate.
The first stage of this process involved passing chlorine into 4-
nitrodiphenyl. Chlorine is a very dangerous gas. I was provided with a
respirator by Dr. W.I. Stephen, which I was told to put on if any chlorine
gas escaped from the fume cupboard. This was a fearsome piece of
apparatus. I had never in my life worn a respirator and I wanted to avoid
putting it on at all costs. It was only a safety precaution for use if the
extractor in the fume cupboard broke down. As all the fume cupboards at
Birmingham University were maintained to a high standard, I did not expect
the respirator to be necessary. I was working in a corridor, adjoining a
large lab. The corridor contained only a fume cupboard. The procedure
required standing near the chlorine cylinder and passing chlorine through
the liquid contained in a large flask for about two hours. Personal
attention was necessary because the chlorine had to be passed through at a
slow speed in order to give time for the necessary reaction to take place.
All went well during the first hour. The flask containing the liquid was
supported on a balance. When the flask had increased in weight by a fixed
amount the reaction was expected to be complete.
I began to get worried because the procedure appeared to be taking a
long time. Several of my colleagues were working in the adjoining lab.
Unfortunately they could not see me. At lunch time they all left the room
and turned off the main switch which controlled the fume cupboards. They
did not notice that I was still at work in the corridor.
I did not notice that the fume cupboard had been turned off. I was
making a mistake in the preparation by passing the chlorine too slowly.
This may have been fortunate as it saved me from being poisoned by the
chlorine. What was escaping from the flask was not chlorine but a volatile
chlorine compound. I did not notice it at first but gradually became aware
of a sweet smell. I panicked. I did not know how to put the respirator on.
I thought I should get out of the atmosphere as soon as possible, so simply
turned off the chlorine cylinder and walked back to the laboratory.
I told Professor Belcher what had happened, as he happened to be in the
analytical laboratory when I got back. So far I had had no successful
results from my research and he was not feeling very pleased with me. He
was angry that I had not brought the reaction flask back with me, but had
simply turned off the chlorine and left my preparation half-finished. Dr.
Stephen was more sympathetic.
Earlier in the day he had seen me working in the corridor which was
rather cold and had offered to complete the preparation himself. I
regretted now that I had not taken advantage of this offer. At this moment
I was feeling rather miserable and tired as I has had nothing to eat. I
usually worked for longer hours than the male colleagues who had three
years to complete their degree and was beginning to feel very tired.
However Dr. Stephen rescued the situation by purifying the compound I
had partially made. He was an expect at preparing 4-amino-4'-
chlorobiphenyl. Only about one third of the estimated amount was made, but
this was enough for me to use in my analytical research.
I worked hard and before Christmas successfully completed an adequate
method for determination of microgram amounts of sulphate. In the end Dr.
Stephen was quite pleased as the method was suitable for publication.
Nephelometry means light-scattering. The success of the method
depended on producing very small evenly-sized particles of precipitated
sulphate, suspended in aqueous solution. A simple optical instrument which
measured the extent of light-scattering, depending on the concentration of
sulphate was used for the determination. After I had completed the initial
method, further checking for the effect of interfering substances was
necessary.This was not completed until about the end of January 1966.
Before this I had a Christmas break, as the University closed
completely for one week. I spent this with Dad at Gordona. By this time
Eve, his housekeeper whom he was hoping to marry was living there. Marriage
depended on getting an annulment of his marriage to his second wife, Mary.
Unfortunately, she had returned to the USA in 1951 and could not be traced.
This prevented the annulment from being granted by the Catholic Church.
Dad continued living with Eve as his housekeeper until the time when Eve
had a stroke and had to be looked after in a cottage hospital. Cottage
hospitals acted as a nursing homes in the 1960's and early 1970's. Eve's
sister, Mavis was living in Bradfield, a village nearby. She visited and
prepared a meal starting with real Yorkshire pudding. Eve and Mavis came
from Yorkshire. Both had married and were now widows, but neither had had
any children. Mavis was feeling rather lonely at this time, and was glad
to spend Christmas at Gordona. With the four of us, the old house was quite
full.
I felt that the amount of experience that 1965 had held for me was
enough to fill ten ordinary years.
1966
I started 1966 with a sense of urgency. Patiently I completed a method
for the determination of traces of sulphate. It was adequate. However there
were some deficiencies in the method. After precipitation the particles
remained stable for only about an hour. The conditions under which the test
was carried out had to be rigorously standardised. However, Dr. Stephen my
supervisor was felt the method was useful enough to be published and
started to write a paper on this subject to be published under the names
Martin and Stephen. This was not finally published until March 1967.
By the end of February 1966 it was felt essential to proceed to examine
similar methods for the nitrate ion. I spent two months on this work and
by the end of April was beginning to feel tired. I knew that by the end of
July I had to write my M.Sc. thesis and it was essential to allow at least
two months for this, for not only had it to be written but also typed and
bound. Five copies were necessary.
At this time I began to write my thesis. This work was mostly done at
home, though I sometimes did some written work in the University Library. A
mishap occurred one cold evening just as I arrived home. I discovered
that the room below mine was on fire. This belonged to the woman who used
to steal my bath water. She appeared to be a very rough woman. She worked
in a greengrocer's shop nearby. At that time the young shop assistant who
was engaged to be married to the man who owned the house was indoors in her
large room on the first floor of the house. I lived on the second floor
where there was only one room. All the other residents were out, including
the landlord, who occupied the ground floor.
I maintained that the fire engine should be called immediately and that
the door to the room which was on fire should be kept shut in order to
prevent the flames from spreading. However the young shop assistant
insisted on getting a bucket full of water from the bathroom to put out the
flames. However as we opened the door a sheet of flame met our eyes and we
quickly shut the door. I convinced Margaret, the shop assistant that it was
dangerous to stay in the house. She was persuaded to go downstairs while I
called the fire engine from the nearby phone box. I went out of the house
hurriedly and forgot to take my keys. There was a Yale lock on my door
upstairs and it had snapped shut. I was worried about the safety of all my
research notes and work written for my thesis in my upstairs room. But
there was no time to worry and I was concerned for the safety of the young
woman.
Fortunately the fire engine arrived promptly. The fire had not spread
beyond the one room and it was successfully extinguished within an hour. As
I had left the room locked the firemen had to put their ladders up to the
third floor and enter my room by the window. They were then able to open
the door and let me enter the flat.
Both my room and Margaret's were completely undamaged.
The furniture in the burnt out room was ruined. However it was safe to
go back into the house to sleep that night. It appeared that the tenant in
the room below me had smoked in bed and had gone out to work that morning
leaving a smouldering cigarette in her bed. When she returned later that
evening the landlord gave her notice. As her room was uninhabitable, she
did not come back into the house again. I was thankful about this as she
had been rough and unpleasant to me on the rare occasions when I saw her.
I do not know where she went. I did not see her again, but imagined that
she had gone to stay with her boy-friend.
When I mentioned the incident to Dr. Stephen in conversation one
afternoon, he advised me to get a room in the YWCA. Aleya, the Iraqi
research student lived there. I would have been glad to take this advice
but felt I could not spare the time to move at present.
Accordingly I stayed on in the dismal room. However it was very quiet
and I was able to use my small manual typewriter quite undisturbed every
evening. I found that typing was more tiring than working in the
laboratory, and the numerous tables and chemical formulae were very tedious
to type. The first chapter I had taken to a typing agency, thinking that
it would be better to have the thesis typed professionally. But when I
examined the result, I found that so many mistakes had been made with
chemical formulae and technical words and occasionally with figures in the
tables of results, that I had to do an enormous amount of very tedious
corrections on the finished copies. I decided that it would be quicker to
type the whole thesis myself. I had to use four carbons in the typewriter
in order to produce five copies. The faintest and least readable copy was
the one which I kept for myself.
Meanwhile I continued to work daily in the laboratory but had to
content myself with shorter hours in order to allow myself time to write
and then type the earlier parts of the thesis. I was still working very
long hours.
Occasionally I visited the local shops. I discovered a shop which
specialised in selling unusual curious items. In this shop I purchased a
propelling pencil. These have gone out of fashion. The lead was encased in
a metal container and the pencil was gradually drawn up so that the point
was protruding by a suitable amount. These pencils needed no sharpening.
This operation was accomplished mechanically in the interior of the metal
cylinder, so that a sharp point always protruded. The propelling pencil I
had purchased was superb. It had three cylinders with different coloured
leads, so that these colours could quickly be changed and put into the
correct position for use. In addition twelve more coloured leads were
contained in an outer annular space surrounding the working cylinder. If I
wished to use one of these supplementary colours, I had to change it with
one of the three main colours. Nevertheless this was a quick operation and
the whole set of fifteen colours were always available in a handy portable
form. I used these colours to illustrate my thesis in colour. I had to do
the drawings separately for each one of the five copies. I think I was the
only research student who went to this amount of trouble to represent the
colours of separated compounds on my strips of chromatography paper. This
was done in relationship to my studies of the dye Sulphonazo 2.
Meanwhile in the laboratory I had to proceed with the determination of
trace amounts of nitrate.
I did not have to undertake any difficult organic preparations with the
two nitrate methods. The samples of organic compounds used had already been
prepared by Dr. Stephen. I had to recover the reagent from each set of
tests to be used again, not only because the compound was expensive but
because preparing it freshly was a long tedious procedure. The solvents
consumed in the recovery process were much less expensive than the reagent
and the procedure was not time-consuming. I produced two accurate methods
for determining very small amounts of nitrate, and these were written about
in my thesis. However, they were not more sensitive than previously
published methods. By sensitive I mean that the method should be suitable
for determining smaller traces of nitrate than previous methods. My
sulphate method had fulfilled this criterion but the nitrate method failed
to do so; therefore Dr. Stephen decided not to publish these results in a
scientific paper.
Then I had a reason for excitement. While I was engaged in nitrate
determinations, I discovered a much better method of preparing gum ghatti,
the additive used to stabilise particles for measurements of their light-
scattering properties in suspension. This was of sufficient merit for me to
feel that it was worthwhile to repeat the sulphate determination using the
new form of gum ghatti. My time was running out. It was late in May 1966,
and I worked late in the evenings, delaying the typing of the thesis until
I had invented an improved method for sulphate determination, which was
even better than the one I had worked out in January. Dr. Stephen judged
this suitable for an additional publication. On this occasion Professor
Belcher was very pleased with me, and mentioned my hard work while giving a
talk to all of the assembled research students with whom I had spent a year
of my working life.
I felt very pleased and elated at this moment, though very tired. This
work was not completed until the end of July.
Then I had to go home and type up the rest of the results and get the
thesis bound by the University Library. In August I had two interviews
for employment. The first person turned me down, but I succeeded in getting
employment with Cadbury. I did not like my new prospective supervisor very
much. I had some suspicion of him at the interview because he told me that
my research thesis was not important and that I should start work straight
away and not type the thesis up. I refused to do this but accepted the
offer of a post, starting from the beginning of October. This left me the
rest of August and September to get the thesis typed and bound. The last
two weeks in August I spent in the lab cleaning all the used apparatus and
taking it back to the stores. Some of the students neglected to do this.
However I was very loath to leave the University where I had spent such a
happy year, and being rather tired, the cleaning took me a long time. In
between I chatted to some of my colleagues. Some of these would continue
working next year, but Colin who had been so kind to me was on the last
year of his three year research for Ph.D. He was awarded his Ph.D. but had
no publications which I believe was a disappointment to him. Nevertheless,
he obtained a first-class post in the research department of a large
chemical company. Aleya also completed her thesis for Ph.D. and was
employed by a chemical company in Birmingham. I did not see either of these
friends again.