INQUIRY COMMISSIONER 23.8.1842
(aged 54)
Until 1841 Procter and Mylne were working about fifty days a
year for the
commission. (3.6.2 table). During the Inquiry they
probably
worked full time.
Armour contains the following suggestively inaccurate
paragraph:
"Mr Procter was called to the bar in 1831, and in 1832 he
closed his
career as a poet, by publishing English Songs. In
this year he
accepted the office of Metropolitan Commissioner in Lunacy..
his
appointment was annually renewed, until he became on of the
permanent
commission constituted by the Act of 1842. Up to this date
his official
duties were limited to London, and the terms of his
appointment allowed
him to continue his private practice as a conveyencer; but
from that
year.. the work of his office was more onerous, kept him
continually
travelling about the country, and was legally as well as
practically,
incompatible with the private exercise of his profession."
(Armour,
R.W.
1935 p. 95)
Private practice was not legally incompatible with his being a
legal
commissioner until 1845 (See
Lunacy Commission). Although it would have been in
1842
if the original proposal for a Barrister Commission had been
accepted
(See
4.3.2). His Commissionership was also not formally
permanent
until 1845 (See
provisions of 1832 Madhouse Act).
Nevertheless this passage, and a later one (##INCLUDE:
probably one about pensions), suggest that his work was, in
practice, full
time from 1842. This impression is re-inforced by the way the
total cost of
Commissioners fees and salaries leapt dramatically at the
beginning of the
Inquiry, but did not do so again when the Lunacy Commission
formally
started in 1845 (See Growth
in the Commission's Expenditure 1829-1871
(5.3.4b.TA))
An increased income and expectations of greater financial
security may also
have tempted the Procters to move house. In 1843 the family
moved to 13
Upper Harley Street, "closer to the fashionable centre of
London" where
their large literary parties and "at homes" became famous.
Early in 1854
they moved to a house in an adjoining street: 32 Weymouth
Street.
Procter wrote to Carlyle on 20.9.1843 about the Rebecca riots:
"It is not the first time that that unholy Trinity (the
Lawyer, the Parson,
and the Justice of the Peace) has trod upon the corn or corns
of the poor,
but it is the first time that the poor have especially given
them a kick in
return. I do not like Wales. It is a mean country,
notwithstanding its high
places. There are many hundred lunatics in Wales, who (many of
them as
helpless as children) are boarded out at various rates,
(ranging from
one shilling to three !) per week. The gentry
will not
conspire to build an asylum - and the parish people will not
pay enough to
keep the poor creatures in decency."
"I shall (this year) have some three weeks of vacation, I
believe - a very
rare thing"
1843 Procter edited The Works of Shakespeare,
with a memoir
and essay, published in 1843:
"The Works of Shakespere
Revised from the best authorities: with a memoir, and essay on
his genius,
by Barry Cornwall: also, annotations and introductory remarks
on the plays,
by many distinguished writers.
London: Robert Tyas, 1843. Illustrated with wood engravings
from designs by
Kenny Meadows (1790-1874). This is the first edition to
seriously attempt
to integrate the text and the illustrations on the page."
(external
link)
On 1.9.1844 Procter wrote to Forster:
"I have been travelling... Liverpool, Lancaster, Preston,
Manchester,
Leeds... York... I hear nothing - I see nothing, but tunnels
and railroad -
madmen and chambermaids. None other things interest me - and I
have no
escapes or perils to speak of. I am sick of travelling. I was
made to sit
still, and dream, and eat and drink, and go to bed, and wake
in the
morning, and do the same thing over again"
He noted the enormous number of children swarming like locusts
in
Manchester and the suburbs leading to Oldham. Each one, he
commented, had,
philosophically speaking, as much right to live as himself,
Forster and
Shakespeare. It was a thought worth recording for
communicating to the
public when the public was ripe for the disclosure.
Procter also communicated the following dialogue between
A: "a
person of education" (I assume the medical commissioner he was
travelling
with) and B: "costermonger, thief, drunkard, and of
other trades"
(whose sanity is clearly being examined):
A: "Do you wish to know the Truth?"
B: "Ay, by God!"
A: "Then look at me. I am the Truth!"
B: "Are you, by God?"
A: "Yes, and we shall meet again on the last day"
B: "Very well: then gi' us two penn'orth o' gin!"
"Should you imagine either party mad?" he asked Forster. "If
so, which?"